Mike Forrester Wants To Continue Working for Job Creation

New State Representative Has Become Known As Jobs Advocate

Spartanburg, SC - March 3, 2010 - After just one year in the State House of Representatives, Mike Forrester has become known as a strong advocate for job creation through conservative reforms. Forrester has been a consistent voice for restrained spending, lower taxes, and government restructuring, doing what it takes to support the business community and to empower South Carolina’s workforce. In announcing his bid for re-election today, Forrester released the following statement:

“I’m going to run by doing the same thing I did last time. I’m going to walk to as many doors as possible to talk directly with voters about the tools it takes to grow our economy and create jobs.

Businesses won’t expand or relocate here just because we cross our fingers and hope. The groundwork needs to be laid beforehand. The departure of many jobs from the Upstate means we have to rethink the
sort of jobs we’re going to have. We’re already seeing growth in the high-tech manufacturing industry, creating new workforce requirements and a new demand on our education system.

One of my goals is to work to make two- and four-year colleges more affordable so that people can go back to school and adapt to the changing economy.

As well, we can’t ignore basic infrastructure needs – one of the last things a business owner wants to hear is, “You can’t get there from here.” When the government spends money, it should be on necessities like keeping up our roads. South Carolina’s location, in addition to the Port of Charleston, sets up our area to be in a good position when it comes to transportation. We need to ensure that those trucks have good roads to travel on.

And, those roads should lead to Spartanburg County. That particular task is not as easy as it once was, and not just because of the economy. Over the past two elections, the Upstate has lost a lot of its clout in the General Assembly. That means it’s even more important for Upstate legislators to band together to look out for your interests in Columbia.

There are few interests more important than having a good job. A number of bills are already in the works to facilitate job creation – lower taxes, government restructuring and spending caps. Big government is as bad for business as it is for your wallet. By cutting away bureaucracy, we’re able to save your money and keep to Thomas Jefferson’s axiom that, “government is best which governs least.” With common-sense government reforms like zero-based budgeting and spending caps, the stage is set for legislators to control and limit the growth of government.

Efforts to bring about spending caps and pass meaningful tax reduction on businesses haven’t been too successful lately. It’s past time for the General Assembly to act and provide meaningful results to South Carolina companies. Legislators also need to stand up for small business. While bringing in big companies like Boeing and BMW is not something to discount, it’s also important to pay attention to the
small businesses that supply the big ones. We need to look at creative ways to help our smaller companies grow their businesses and remain competitive. Additionally, we need to focus on ways we can help entrepreneurs on the road to opening new businesses. Bringing in jobs from out-of-state and helping existing businesses prosper is good, but we need to allow people the opportunity to grow companies from the bottom up.

Let’s not forget about tort reform, either. The increasingly outrageous cost of insurance – health and otherwise – is being driven by frivolous lawsuits in the civil court system. Businesses are bearing the brunt of these costs and addressing and fixing the tort system in our state will go a long way to making South Carolina a more hospitable place to do commerce.

It’s a full plate, but the work is needed, and so much remains to be done. That’s why I’ve decided to run again to represent District 34 in the State House. We need to keep up the fight in Columbia to make this a great place to work. ”

###

Timken Selects Duncan, S.C., Facility in Spartanburg County for New Distribution Center

Company to add 100 area jobs in move to larger facility

The Timken Company (NYSE: TKR) today announced it has selected a 300,000 square-foot leased facility in the Spartanburg County community of Duncan, S.C., as the location of a new distribution center. Timken has committed to invest $3 million and bring 100 new jobs to the area, in addition to 50 associates already employed by the company at an existing distribution facility in Spartanburg, who will transfer to the new facility in the Spartan Green Business Park as the company begins to occupy the space in December.

“We are very pleased to expand our presence in Spartanburg County. Having a larger facility in the area provides significant customer service efficiencies,” said Chris Coughlin, president of Timken’s
process industries division. Coughlin noted that the opportunity to streamline distribution logistics became apparent through the company’s “Project O.N.E.” global business system and process-improvement initiative. “With much of our supply chain based in the Southeast, consolidating our distribution in the region will help us reduce movements between locations to serve customers more quickly. That also will make our operation leaner and greener.”

“Timken has a long history in South Carolina and this announcement further strengthens the company’s commitment to our state. Timken’s decision to expand its operations in Spartanburg County is a strong testament that our business-friendly climate, exceptional market access and skilled workforce are continuing to provide the tools existing businesses need to grow. We congratulate Timken in its
expansion and wish the company continued success in its endeavors here,” said Joe Taylor, Secretary of Commerce of the State of South Carolina.

David Britt, chairman of Spartanburg County Council Economic Recruitment and Development, and board member of the Economic FuturesGroup, added, “We are excited by Timken’s continued investment and addition of 100 new jobs in Spartanburg County. The strategic decision to locate a distribution center here reinforces our cost effectiveness as a location accessible to 70 percent of the U.S. population from within two days’ truck transport.”

South Carolina State Representative Mike Forrester said, “This reaffirms the importance of our state’s port in the recruitment process and further positions Spartanburg as a logistics hub. In addition to the new jobs Timken will create, it is also important to note that by successfully recruiting this expansion in Spartanburg County, we also retained 50 existing jobs. During these trying economic times, job retention is just as important as job creation, and we are very pleased with Timken’s decision.”

About The Timken Company

The Timken Company (NYSE: TKR, http://www.timken.com) keeps the world
turning, with innovative friction management and power transmission
products and services, enabling our customers’ machinery to perform
more efficiently and reliably. With sales of $5.7 billion in 2008 and
operations in 26 countries, Timken is Where You Turn™ for better
performance.

Barrett focuses on jobs, lifting up state

Republican U.S. Rep. Gresham Barrett, in his quest to become South Carolina’s next governor, wants to focus on the future — if the past and the present will let him.

Some of the hurdles he faces aren’t specific to any one candidate.

With every new story that breaks regarding embattled Gov. Mark Sanford, the blemishes on the Governor’s Office mount — leaving one more loose end for Sanford’s successor to tie up. And the embarrassment Sanford’s personal life has caused this state is something no one wants to repeat.

Former State Rep. Doug Smith, who accompanied Barrett across the Upstate on Monday, said that legacy is something that will have to be addressed.

“Whoever replaces (Sanford) is going to have to deal with it,” Smith said. “Whatever you think about the governor … The public has already formed its opinion. For South Carolina’s governor to be in the national news on almost a weekly basis under these circumstances … that’s not what we need to be known for. We need someone with integrity, and that’s why I’ve been with Gresham since the beginning.”

The Herald-Journal asked Barrett point blank if he had ever been unfaithful to his wife: “No, I have not,” he said. The couple mark their 25th anniversary later this month.

Barrett called on Sanford to resign soon after the sitting governor admitted an affair with an Argentine woman, but he was hesitant to go beyond that Monday.

“The past is the past. Governor Sanford’s legacy is Governor Sanford’s legacy. I want him to deal with that however he sees fit. All I can control is what I do and what our team’s vision is for South Carolina. And that’s what we’re pitching,” he said on a bus from Spartanburg Community College’s Tyger River Campus to the Timken plant in Gaffney.

“I’d love to sit here and tell you that everybody’s enamored with Gresham Barrett, and he’s the greatest thing since sliced bread. And I think there’s people out there who like me. But one of the reasons our campaign is growing in strength is because of the things we’re talking about — it’s the positive side of South Carolina. It’s about hope, it’s about pulling people together, and it’s about formulating a plan that gets politics out of government and takes South Carolina some place she’s never been before. And it comes with one word: J-O-B-S. Jobs. It’s economic development, it’s education and it’s energy.”

Barrett said he was impressed with the Tyger River facility, and as governor, he could work to point companies considering a move to South Carolina in that direction. He also talked about the need for a liaison, either in the Governor’s Office or another state agency, to work with businesses and get them in front of decision-makers rather than bogged down in bureaucracy.

But the congressman has some history of his own to deal with.

Barrett voted in favor of last year’s $700 billion bailout of the financial industry, on its second go-round. He has since voted against government stimulus plans. But that one vote is burned into the minds of some Upstate voters. Barrett was booed mercilessly at a heavily attended tea party in Greenville earlier this year.

U.S. Rep. Bob Inglis last week got similar treatment in Boiling Springs. Inglis later discussed fear-mongering with the Herald-Journal, how national personalities such as Glenn Beck undermine Americans’ belief in a constitutional republic and hamper real debate.

Barrett, on the other hand, seemed to embrace the more vocal members of his party.

“These are American people who are voicing their opinions. They’re afraid that they’re losing control of their life. They’re afraid they’re losing control of who they are and what they are. I don’t think they’re extreme either way. I think they’re concerned about their country. They’re concerned about the direction it’s going,” he said.

“…The strongest voice in the United States of America is being heard right now. And that is the American citizen. And that is because, for whatever reason, they think they’re getting a raw deal on this health care debate. And I don’t think they’re extremists; I don’t think they’re radicals; I don’t think they’re ultra right-wingers. I think they’re mom-and-pops; they’re students; they’re retirees; they’re special-needs folks that are concerned about — in some cases, afraid — the direction their country is going. And the only voice they feel like they have right now is to let their voice be heard.”

Barrett will spend the rest of this week and next making stops around the state.

In a 30-plus minute interview with the Herald-Journal Monday, he said, the current direction of the country “certainly, in many cases, usurps the 10th Amendment,” which grants states all rights not clearly given to the federal government.

Other Republicans seeking the nomination for governor include Attorney General Henry McMaster, state Sen. Larry Grooms, state Rep. Nikki Haley and almost certainly Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer.

At least five Democrats also are running or are considering a bid

Jason Spencer
goupstate.com

State House 34: Forrester wins race to replace Talley

Both men running in the Republican primary for South Carolina House District 34 spent most of Tuesday at West View Elementary School, working to eke out a few more votes.

Mike Forrester claimed the win at that precinct, and went on to defeat Ken Roach by a total of 2,054 to 1,627.

Since Democrat Ronnie Hart withdrew from the general election because of health reasons, Forrester will face no opposition this November. Read more

Leadership Spartanburg 2008 Alumnus of the Year

Spartanburg Herald-Journal
5/13/08

Leadership Spartanburg Alumni Association named Mike Forrester its 2008 Alumnus of the Year.

Forrester has distinguished himself in business and the Spartanburg community as a dedicated leader. Whether serving his country or his community, Mike has always sought opportunities to lead others towards a brighter future.

Mike works with businesses and industries within Spartanburg Community College’s service area to develop and foster relationships that improve efficiency, productivity and competitiveness. He serves as a resource for industrial prospects and new industries to ensure training needs are assessed and met.

Mike provides vision and strategic plans for the College’s service area and assists in reaching long term economic goals. In addition, he represents the College with regards to legislative and governmental relations.

Mike’s current professional affiliations include involvement in the Action Team for Spartanburg/Cherokee Development Corporation, Economic Growth Council – Spartanburg Area Chamber of Commerce, Professional Development Committee for the South Carolina Economic Developers’ Association and as Vice Chair for the Leadership Spartanburg Board of Regents and a Board Member of the Spartanburg Downtown Rotary Club.

Mike’s many honors include the SC Economic Development Association’s 2006 Volunteer of the Year Award, Spartanburg Area Chamber of Commerce’s 2006 Neville Holcombe Distinguished Citizenship Award, Carolina Counseling Inc.’s

Community Impact Award (2003), Spartanburg Development Association’s 2003 Alan R. Willis Award, Uptown Sertoma Club’s 2000 Service to Mankind Award, Carolina West Region’s 2000 Regional Service to Mankind Award, and Spartanburg Chapter of the Association of Administrative Professionals’ 1997 Executive of the Year Award.

Mike is actively involved in the community and has often assumed leadership roles in volunteer and civic activities. Mike served 30 years in the United States Army Reserves and retired as a Command Sergeant Major of the 391st Engineer Battalion, he is the Immediate Past Chair of the South Carolina State Board of Education, and has held the positions of Treasurer for Spartanburg County Economic Development Corporation Board of Directors, Chair of the Spartanburg Development Association Board of Directors, Chair of Upstate Alliance, Chair of the Junior Achievement of Spartanburg 2003 Annual Campaign, Chair and Executive Board Member of the Spartanburg Area Chamber of Commerce, Chair of the Spartanburg March of Dimes Board of Directors, Chair of the Arts Partnership Campaign, and Chair of the Boys and Girls Club of Metro Spartanburg Board of Directors. In addition to these positions of leadership Mike has lead through service as a member of the South Carolina School for the Deaf and the Blind’s Board of Advisors, the Visions Steering Committee, the Board of Directors for the Workforce Investment Board, Representative Jim DeMint’s Business and Industry Committee, the Board of Directors for the Urban League of the Upstate, the Building Codes Appeals Board for Spartanburg County, the United Way of the Piedmont’s Success by Six Committee, the Board of Directors for Junior Achievement of Spartanburg, the Board of Visitors for Spartanburg Regional Medical Center, and the Steering Committee for Spartanburg County Parks and Recreation.

What’s the real agenda? Group raises questions with fliers

Spartanburg Herald-Journal
By Jason Spencer
5/15/08

Hundreds of fliers are appearing in Spartanburg mailboxes supporting a specific slate of candidates, billing them as tax-cutting conservatives. But some say that the spending issues highlighted on those fliers are a veil to cover the group’s real agenda, school choice.

South Carolinians for Responsible Government has sent mailings in support of Republican candidates Roger Nutt, an engineer facing incumbent Rep. Keith Kelly, and Joey Millwood, a journalist facing incumbent Rep. Bob Walker in June. The group has also sent out a flier supporting Ken Roach, who is running against fellow Republican and retired gas company executive Mike Forrester to challenge Democrat Ronnie Hart in November.

The candidates supported by South Carolinians for Responsible Government say that group issued its support without their knowledge, but they welcome it. The Responsible Government group’s leaders say their organization is being pigeonholed as a single-issue advocate. S.C. law does not require so-called political awareness groups to disclose their donors, so it is unclear who is funding these mailings.

The content of the mail pieces focuses on the growth in state spending in recent years. The mailings contend that the current $7.2 billion budget represents about a 41 percent increase over the $5.1 billion budget from the 2003-04 spending cycle.

The first flier for Nutt and Millwood features a cartoon pig and a “Columbia Politician Pork Sampler” listing various programs funded by state grants. The second one features a masked man on the front, a chubby, cigar-smoking man in a suit and tie on the inside and proclaims, “We used to call them bank robbers. Now we call them Columbia’s Career Politicians.”

“We’ve got to get a handle on our spending. So, we need to look at pork and wasteful spending and cut out as much of that as we can. I’m for a cap on spending,” Nutt said.

“I think that’s great that there’s groups out there that want to support people. It’s hard to say they’re not campaign pieces, but the two I’m looking at, they’re educating the constituents about what’s going on now and about certain candidates.”

Nutt and Millwood said the first time they saw the fliers was after they were mailed out.

Both men have retained the services of consultant Chad Connelly, a board member of South Carolinians for Responsible Government.

Walker and Kelly say their opponents are twisting the numbers, and that looking back to 1994 - the year Republicans took over the state House - the budget has increased an average of 4 percent each year.

“My church budget grows that much,” Kelly said. “I can keep costs down. I can cut it 50 percent. Let him (Nutt) look at it and tell me how many teachers he wants me to fire.”

He added that he didn’t know how he could be considered a “career politician” when he’s only 18 months into his first term.

Nutt said there were plenty of other avenues the state could take to cut costs before firing teachers.

“If Keith really wants to get involved, tell him to call for a recorded vote next time, so we’ll know for a fact he didn’t vote himself a pay raise,” Nutt said.

Walker said 4 percent is an increase tied to population growth and inflation, the standard Republicans have set for spending. He cited the Legislature cutting grocery taxes, property taxes and income taxes in the last several years.

“To say that I’m against cutting taxes, or imply that, that’s not true,” Walker said.

Nutt and Millwood said that focusing on recent years is more indicative of spending trends in South Carolina.

“In recent years, it’s grown more than 40 percent. That’s an odd change. That’s not what conservatism is about. That’s not what being a Republican is about,” Millwood said.

“Since 1994 … you can say a lot of things. My household output has not grown over 40 percent in the last few years. And I don’t think it has for a lot of South Carolina households. So, the government shouldn’t have grown that much. We’re not talking about 1994.”

Dollars and diplomas

Political consultant Wesley Donahue called the fliers a diversion from South Carolinians for Responsible Government’s true agenda - putting legislators in Columbia who support school choice.

Donahue’s client list includes Kelly, Forrester, and state Rep. Scott Talley, who is seeking a Senate seat against Lee Bright and L.B. Watson.

“Look at those mail pieces, and you will know which legislators stand with South Carolina public schools,” Donahue said. “Bob Walker, Keith Kelly, Mike Forrester - these are people that stand with Spartanburg County public schools. It’s these Ken Roaches and Roger Nutts of the world that have sold their soul to the voucher crowd.”

“These guys are being back-funded, and recruited by these out-of-state millionaires who want to experiment on our public schools,” Donahue said. “They should have to disclose. Everybody else does. That’s what’s so dirty about this whole thing.”

On school choice, Roach has said that modernizing classrooms, recruiting higher-quality teachers - also possibly increasing teacher salaries - and getting more parents involved in education could make the issue moot. At a forum this week, Roach emphatically denied that his vote was for sale.

Millwood has said that he would not support vouchers but would consider tax credits for parents who opt to send their children to a nonpublic school.

Nutt takes a similar stance, adding that a tax credit wouldn’t account for the total dollar amount the state gives each school per pupil, and that in the long run, public schools would make money off of some parents having a choice. In other words, the parents would receive a tax credit, and the school would receive the balance of the money it would have gotten for that student, even though that student would be enrolled somewhere else.

“School choice itself is a tenet of the Republican Party. So, the concept that parents are given a choice as to how their children are educated is something I would stand behind. The voucher idea, I’m not for. But I would entertain looking at the tax credits,” Nutt said.

“It shows the government is not working against families, but that it’s trying to help. If nothing else, it’s symbolic.”

Campaigning vs. educating

South Carolinians for Responsible Government has been tied to New York millionaire Howard Rich, who has supported a number of Republican candidates in this state through a variety of organizations and like-minded associates.

In 2006, South Carolinians for Responsible Government sued the State Ethics Commission after its director said it was trying to influence an election and had to disclose financial information. The state Attorney General’s Office refused to provide the ethics commission with attorneys, and the case was eventually dismissed.

A bill this year that would have required political awareness organizations to disclose their financial information went nowhere.

Neil Mellen, spokesman for South Carolinians for Responsible Government, called forcing a private, membership-supported group to disclose its financial information “ridiculous.”

“We had been sort of pegged as a school-choice group,” he said. “While we see expanding educational opportunities and access as part of that limited, responsible government movement, certainly there are fiscal, spending and revenue, transparency, accountability, and streamlining of government issues. We see school choice as kind of fitting into that. In fact, we’re interested in the larger cause of responsible government.”

Mellen said the fliers were meant to “educate voters about who’s running, and where they stand on issues,” and were not campaign literature.

“That’s semantics,” Kelly said. “This right here is campaign literature.”

Kelly was supported by South Carolinians for Responsible Government two years ago.

Walker, in a separate interview, added, “I don’t consider them education pieces. I consider them negative campaigning. I’m running my campaign on what Bob Walker’s done. If they’re sending out mail pieces to my people, they need to send out what Bob Walker’s done. I mean, I’m one of 124 (members of the state House of Representatives).”

South Carolinians for Responsible Government is just one of many groups that have taken an interest in local races.

The Spartanburg Home Builders Association, for instance, has begun issuing endorsements, and the Spartanburg Board of Realtors has, through its associated statewide political action committee, begun contributing to candidates, too.

The South Carolina AARP also has sent postcards out of Columbia thanking Talley for his work on identity theft legislation. It includes a disclaimer that the card does not constitute a political endorsement.

“What’s happening is that South Carolinians for Responsible Government and the S.C. Club for Growth seem to be the two that are pouring money in our local campaigns. If they do fliers, it’s basically the same as giving money,” Spartanburg County Republican Party Chairman Rick Beltram said.

“I welcome everybody’s involvement. And I will not throw stones at any of them as long as none of them throw stones at me” Beltram said.

“I think all of them are accurate to a point, but if you fact check them down to the minutiae, you’ll find disparities in all that stuff. I don’t think there’s a flier that’s gone out by any candidate or group that poses something as a fact that, in reality, is open to debate.”

Light barbs on cue at GOP debate

Spartanburg Herlad-Journal
By Jason Spencer
5/13/08

Like the sauce, the various candidates to take the stage Monday night at Ron’s Hog Pen BBQ were mostly different shades of red - and some of them had a little kick.

Sixteen state and local Republican candidates sat shoulder to shoulder on a tiny stage for nearly three hours in exchange for, at the most, about five minutes of scattered speaking time in a wide-ranging debate sponsored by the local GOP. Another arrived late, and opted to stand on the stage steps rather than shoehorn himself into the group.

For some of the topics, many of the answers were predictable - no one opposed putting a cap on state spending, for instance, and no one outright opposed requiring private employers to use a federal database to verify that their employees are legal residents of the United States - though some talked around it.

Because of so many similar positions, the night was best served by being able to judge which candidates could think on their feet, who seemed the most passionate about different issues, who was the most informed about the issues affecting this state, and who could best handle themselves in front of a crowd.

That’s not to say there were no differences - just that, in some cases, those differences were just as much about poise as they were about positions.

One of the most surprising answers of the night came from county coroner candidate Rick Cherry, who - tired of passing on questions not relevant to that office - jumped in on a question about job growth in Spartanburg County and said tongue-in-cheek that such growth would bring more people, which would mean more deaths, and therefore, underscored the need for a qualified person in that office.

His opponent, Rusty Clevenger, asked over the laughter, “Ladies and gentlemen, what can you say to that?”

Other lines from the night that got a rise from the near-400 people in the crowd:

– House candidate Steve Parker said he would sponsor a bill that requires lawmakers to put their name on every vote they take.

– County Council incumbent Rock Adams often quipped about the 1-minute time limit, which cut him off several times as he was just getting into a list of statistics he brought. (He also brought a chart.)

– House candidate Christina Jeffrey went beyond the current immigration question, saying E-Verify issue would be solved this year, and that next year, she would sponsor a resolution every day to call on the federal government to enforce the laws on the books.

– House incumbent Bob Walker played up a stipulation he added to the immigration reform bill in Columbia that would prevent children here illegally from getting state scholarships.

– Walker’s challenger, Joey Millwood, got a burst of cheers when, after agreeing with Walker that the state government needs to be less involved in higher education, he suggested that part of the problem with rising tuition costs was overpaid “liberal professors.”

– Rep. Scott Talley, who is seeking an open Senate seat, closed the night with a laugh by thanking his opponents for all of the courtesies they extended to him. (Neither of them showed up.)

For incumbents, the night was a chance to highlight their records. For challengers, it was a chance to try to prove their opponents disingenuous or, a favorite of the night, in the pocket of special interest groups.

As the night wore on, House candidate Mike Forrester alluded to his opponent, Ken Roach, being funded by out-of-state special interest groups. Roach said emphatically that his vote was not for sale, and he claimed Forrester was propped up to run for office by the local chamber of commerce.

GOP gathering for debate after BBQ

21 candidates invited to discuss issues important to campaigns

Spartanburg Herald-Journal
By Jason Spencer
5/15/08

A boatload of Republican state and local candidates will sit down to eat pork Monday night before they spend two hours talking about cutting it, among other things.

Twenty-one candidates have been invited to a forum hosted by the Spartanburg County Republican Party. The debate begins at 7 p.m. at Ron’s Family Restaurant. The event will feature questions by Herald-Journal Editorial Page Editor Mike Smith, Hometown News reporter Leon Russ and WORD radio personality Bob McLain.

The panel also can opt to ask questions submitted beforehand by the audience.

“What I’m trying to accomplish is to let the general public come and see all the candidates for all the local contested primary races at one time,” county GOP Chairman Rick Beltram said.

“It helps when you can compare a House race in one area with a House race in a nearby area. I think everybody realizes that nobody can go down to Columbia and say, ‘I’m going to hold down spending.’ You can’t do it by yourself. It has to be a group of people … forming a working majority to get things passed.”

The format is simple. A question is posed, and each candidate has a chance to respond. If they choose to respond, they’ll have one minute. A three-person panel of judges will determine whether someone is allowed a 30-second rebuttal after a response.

For instance, if incumbent Rep. Keith Kelly doesn’t answer a question, there would be less pressure on his challenger, Roger Nutt, to answer that question — and vice versa. But if one candidate from any given race answers, it’s a safe bet the others competing for that seat will interject, too.

About 100 tickets are left (out of an initial 300) for a pre-debate dinner that begins at 5:30 p.m. A short county GOP executive committee meeting will take place between dinner and the 7 p.m. debate.

The two candidates in the 4th Congressional District and the two for U.S. Senate have been invited to speak for up to five minutes each before the debate starts.

Campaigns of incumbent Rep. Bob Inglis and his challenger, Charles Jeter, both confirmed they will be there. Incumbent Sen. Lindsey Graham will not be able to attend because of business in Washington, his campaign said, but he is sending state House Speaker Pro Tem Doug Smith to speak in his place. The campaign of Buddy Witherspoon, who is challenging Graham, has confirmed he will be there.

Each candidate has been given a short questionnaire on about a dozen issues, ranging from school consolidation to impact fees to an added tax on cigarettes.

The results from those questionnaires will be compiled and handed out to the audience before the debate begins, Beltram said.

The barbecue restaurant is just north of I-85 on Highway 9.

SHJ - Letter to the Editor

I truly hope the voters of S.C. House District 34 will take advantage of their great opportunity to vote for Mike Forrester in the upcoming election for the House District 34 seat. It is my honor to be counted among Mike’s enthusiastic supporters because I can speak personally of the exemplary qualifications he brings to his candidacy.

Read more

SHJ | Forrester lines up support, war chest

Local money seems to be lining up behind Republican Mike Forrester in the race for state House District 34.

The seat is up for grabs, as Rep. Scott Talley has left it vacant to pursue a state Senate bid.

Forrester has about four times as much in his campaign war chest as rival Republican Ken Roach, whom he will face in the June primary.

Read more

Next Page »

blog counter